9 Discworld, 4 Tamora Pierce
Oct. 14th, 2004 04:56 pmHehe.
I think I posted some of these Tamora Pierce icons before, sorry if I have.
1.
2. 
2.
3.
4. 
5.
1.
6.
7. 
8.
9.
10.
11. 
12.
13. 
think that's all for now. Some of the Discworld quotes were found here, for reference.
I think I posted some of these Tamora Pierce icons before, sorry if I have.
1.
2. 
2.
3.
4. 
5.
1.
6.
7. 
8.
9.
10.
11. 
12.
13. 
think that's all for now. Some of the Discworld quotes were found here, for reference.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 09:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 09:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 10:01 pm (UTC)Yes, it is - you missed the "i" in it
Date: 2004-10-15 12:17 am (UTC)David Hume held that causes and effects are not real (or at least not knowable), but imagined by our mind to make sense of the observation that A often occurs together with or slightly before B. All we can observe are correlations, not causations.
See also post hoc ergo propter hoc; Synchronicity; Linear regression; Global warming controversy; Interaction; Placebo; Logic;
Real or imagined, Attribution Theory is the theory concerning how people explain individual occurances of causation. Attribution can be external (assigning causality to an outside agent or force - claiming that some outside thing motivated the event) or internal (assigning causality to factors within the person - taking personal responsibility or accountability for one's actions and claiming that the person was directly responsible for the event). Taking causation one step further, the type of attribution a person provides influences their future behavior."
and on and on...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 09:35 am (UTC)And for the lovely philosophical lecture on casuality. ;) I'm glad I'm not a philosopher.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 09:35 am (UTC)Glad you liked.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-23 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-24 04:46 pm (UTC)